Pros and Cons of CLM by Rohina Jogi; SEM by Rohina and Grace; TEM by Grace Ngau, revised and edited by Amy Zhao
Table of Pros and Cons
| Compound Light Microscope |
+ | it has been extremely important in the development of the biological sciences and of medicine |
+ | easy to use |
+ | inexpensive related to electron microscopes |
+ | can look at live samples |
- | viruses, molecules and atoms cannot be viewed (viewed only with an electron microscope) |
- | can't magnify more than 2000 times |
| Scanning Electron Microscope |
+ | large depth of field allows more of a specimen to be in focus at one time |
+ | uses electromagnets rather than lenses so the researcher has much more control in the degree of magnification. |
+ | strikingly clear images |
- | unable to produce colour |
- | specimen must be electrically conductive |
| Transmission Electron Microscope |
+ | provides information on crystaline structures and density maps |
+ | it enables you to see subatomic resolutions |
+ | requires the sample to be cut into thin slices and placed in a vacuum, therefore there might be damage to the specimen, producing in inaccurate observations |
- | low contrast |
- | high resolusion Transmission Electron Microscope is expensive |
Sources
http://www.labessentials.com/Microscopes_Compound_Basics.htm
http://www.madsci.org/posts/archives/jan99/915771165.Gb.r.html
http://www.purdue.edu/REM/rs/sem.htm
http://www.bwxt.com/operations/semlab.html
http://www.nanoword.net/library/defgen/generate.php?termid=109
http://www.udel.edu/chem/bahnson/chem645/presentations/Bianco.pdf
Comments (0)
You don't have permission to comment on this page.